News
One of the biggest tax audit risks for foreign-invested enterprises or those with related-party transactions is the service costs paid to the parent or affiliated companies. Despite proper accounting and payment, tax authorities often disallow these expenses for CIT purposes if they are not proven reasonable.
This article outlines the specific requirements and 5 key principles for businesses to defend such service costs.
1. Nature of Parent Company Service Costs
Common services include:
Strategic management & operation
HR training & recruitment support
Legal, accounting, and system consulting
IT, software, and tech platforms
Branding, marketing, and market research
These costs are often charged as a percentage of revenue or on a fixed allocation basis. Due to the intangible nature of the value, they are easily deemed unnecessary or irrelevant.
2. When Are These Costs Disallowed?
Per Circular 96/2015/TT-BTC, deductible costs must:
Be supported by legitimate invoices and documents
Serve business operations
Be reasonably priced (not exceeding market rate)
They are commonly rejected if:
No specific service contract exists
No proof of service performed
Arbitrary allocations
Generic services overlapping local company functions
No demonstrated economic benefit
3. 5 Principles to Justify Reasonableness
Principle 1: Clear and Legally Valid Contract
Must be bilingual (if foreign), with detailed terms: service type, pricing method, payment period, acceptance criteria
Include annexes describing service scope, duration, KPIs
Signed by legal representatives from both sides, properly stamped
Principle 2: Verifiable Evidence of Services Rendered
Evidence can include:
Emails, reports, training slides, meeting minutes
IT access logs, strategic plans, market reports
Internal training docs, HR plans
Principle 3: Prove Necessity & No Overlap with Local Functions
Use organization charts to show function division
Show HQ provides strategic direction vs. local operations
Justify the value-added nature of HQ services
Principle 4: Reasonable Pricing with Clear Basis
Use Cost-Plus method: actual cost + 5–10% markup
Allocation by revenue, headcount, or subsidiary count
Include cost breakdown and benchmarking if fee >10% of revenue
Principle 5: Clearly Disclosed in Transfer Pricing File
As per Decree 132/2020/NĐ-CP, related-party service costs must be documented in:
Local File: transaction nature, pricing method, economic benefit
Master File: group model, cost-sharing mechanisms
CbCR (if applicable): Form 04
Conclusion:
These are not prohibited costs, but failing to justify them may lead to tax back payments, fines, and reputational damage. Enterprises must:
Proactively review documentation
Retain internal explanation files and evidence
Declare properly in transfer pricing disclosures
Consult tax experts for complex/risky transactions